|
 |
 |

 |
| For many years, California has
maintained standards for fluid milk that meet or exceed the
Federal Standards. This has been accomplished through the fortification
of milk with non-fat milk solids, which offers improved taste
in addition to nutritional benefits. As the following summary
indicates, fortification of fluid milk is essential to the nutritional
well-being of Californians. |
|
|
Nutrient Contribution of Fortified Fluid Milk
Calcium:
Intake versus
Recommendations
Dietary guidelines and government agency reports clearly support the need for attaining adequate calcium intakes
throughout the lifecycle. In 1997 the Food and Nutrition Board of
the National Academy of Sciences revealed national recommendations
for calcium, which increased for most age groups. These recommendations
show that calcium intakes
need to be higher to optimize bone formation in the younger years
and minimize loss in the older years.
Dietary intake surveys repeatedly
show that many people fail to meet these calcium recommendations.
In the nationwide 1994-95 Continuing Survey of Food Intake by
Individuals (CSFII), the median calcium intake for boys aged 14-18
years was 1094 mg/day, and for girls was 713 mg/day, well below
the current recommendation of 1300 mg/day. The graphs
show the gap between intake and recommendations across the lifespan
for both men and women. This calcium "deficit" has severe
consequences for the health of Americans.
As shown in Table
1, milk produced under California standards provides up to
33% more calcium than that produced under the federal standards.
Because dairy products contribute about three-quarters of the
calcium in the American diet, several age groups are more likely
to meet their needs for this important nutrient by drinking California
milk.
Bone Health
Osteoporosis currently afflicts more than 25 million Americans.
It causes an estimated 1.3 million fractures per year, with an
associated enormous financial and personal burden. The two important
factors that affect the occurrence of osteoporosis are an individual's
peak bone mass, which is reached by about age 30, and the rate
of bone loss in later years. Research shows that adequate calcium
intake is critical for achieving peak bone mass and modifies the
rate of bone loss associated with aging. Calcium intake in early
life may account for as much as a 5-10% difference in peak adult
bone mass, which may contribute to a 50% difference in the hip
fracture rate later in life. A recent review of clinical research
also shows that high calcium diets also potentiate the effect
of estrogens on bone mass in post-menopausal women.(1)
The increased calcium content of fortified fluid milk promotes
optimal bone density and decreases the risk of osteoporosis later
in life.
Hypertension
Recent research shows that calcium plays an integral role in modulating
blood pressure. The 1996 "DASH" study (Dietary Approaches
to Stop Hypertension) indicated that people with mild hypertension
could decrease their blood pressure significantly by including
8-10 servings of fruits and vegetables and 2-3 servings of low-fat
dairy foods in their diets every day.(2)
Other studies have also shown inverse
relationships between blood pressure and calcium intakes. An excerpt
from Nutrition Reviews states: "Within the last
15 yrs, numerous observational epidemiologic studies have found
a statistically significant inverse relationship between calcium
intake and higher blood pressure. Associations have been reported
for total calcium intake from foods, including those from dairy
products it is clear from the epidemiologic literature that dietary
calcium plays an integral role in the maintenance of normal blood
pressure, and adequate calcium intake may help reduce the risk
of high blood pressure."(3)
The higher calcium content provided
under California fluid milk standards benefits not only those
with mild hypertension but may also play a preventative role against
the disease.
Cancer
Epidemiological studies have repeatedly shown an inverse relationship
between consumption of dairy products and colorectal cancer.(4-6)
A recent clinical study indicated
that a diet high in low-fat dairy products (equivalent to 1500
mg calcium/day) may decrease the risk of colon cancer.(7)
Other studies indicate an inverse relationship between milk and
dairy intake and the incidence of breast cancer.(8-10)
"There is a protective effect, dietary or habitual, associated
with consumption of milk that overwhelms the associations between
different other factors and risk of breast cancer."(8)
Milk consumption has also been associated
with a reduced risk of cervical cancer(11)
and endometrial cancer.(12)
It is not clear what factor in milk and dairy products is responsible
for a protective effect against cancer. There is some evidence
it may be calcium(7,12)
or a component of milk protein(13)
or milk fat: "Recent research shows that milk fat contains
a number of potentially anticarcinogenic components including
conjugated linoleic acid, sphingomyelin, butyric acid and ether
lipids."(14)
Kidney Stones
New research provides evidence for an inverse association between
dietary calcium intake and risk of kidney stone formation.(15,16)
Other Nutrients
Table 2 shows that milk produced under California
standards contains up to 33% more protein than that produced under
federal standards. Other nutrients are only minimally affected by
the fortification of fluid milks. The positive impact on calcium
content discussed above is achieved with minimal increases in sodium
and calories.
|
|
 |
|
Lactose
Per expert researchers, the increase in lactose in fortified fluid
milks is unimportant in promoting the symptoms associated with lactose
intolerance in lactose maldigestors.(17)
Following is a summary of recent nutrition
recommendations for dietary calcium and calcium-rich foods such
as fortified fluid milk.
National Osteoporosis Foundation
"Calcium plays an important role in maintaining bone. Calcium
alone cannot prevent or cure osteoporosis, but it is an important
part of an overall prevention or treatment program. Yet, national
surveys have shown that many Americans are not consuming enough
calcium. Many women, in fact, consume less than half of the daily
recommended amount of calcium. One way to increase the amount of
calcium in your diet is to eat calcium-rich foods like low-fat milk,
cheese, broccoli, and others. Getting enough calcium
is essential
to maintaining bone strength and can play a vital role in preventing
osteoporosis-related fractures."
National Institutes of
Health
"Calcium is an essential nutrient for developing and maintaining
strong bones throughout life. Optimal calcium intake is most important
from childhood through the mid-twenties, when bones are growing
at their fastest rate, and during late life, when bone loss occurs,
often leading to osteoporosis."
"The National Institutes of Health
recommends that children 6-10 years of age get 800-1200 mg of calcium
per day, or the equivalent of about 3-4 glasses of low-fat milk.
Adolescents and young adults, ages 11-24, whose bones are growing
very fast, need more calcium, between 1200-1500 mg, or about 4-5
glasses of low-fat milk per day."
National Institute of Child
Health and Human Development (NICHD)
"While calcium can be found in a variety of foods, including
vegetables and dairy products, the NICHD believes low-fat milk or
low-fat milk products are the best sources of calcium. The are the
most widely available source of calcium and are already part of
most American diets. Along with calcium, milk provides eight other
essential nutrients, including vitamin D, potassium, and magnesium,
all essential for optimal bone health and human development. Green
leafy vegetables are healthy sources of calcium too, but it takes
7-9 servings of broccoli a day to get the same amount of calcium
that is in 3-4 glasses of milk."
2005 Dietary Guidelines
for Americans
"Diseases caused by vitamin deficiencies are rare in this country.
But some people do not get recommended amounts of a few nutrients,
especially calcium and iron."
"Many women and adolescent girls
need to eat more calcium-rich foods, such as milk products, to get
the calcium they need for healthy bones throughout life."
|
|
 |
|
References
| 1. |
Nieves JW, Komar
L, Cosman F, Lindsay R. Calcium potentiates the effect of estrogen
and calcitonin on bone mass: review and analysis. Am J Clin
Nutr 1998;67:18-24. |
| 2. |
Appel LJ, Moore TJ,
Obarzanek E, et al. A clinical trial of the effects of dietary
patterns on blood pressure. New Engl J Med 1997:336(16):1117-24. |
| 3. |
Osborne CG, McTyre
RB, Dudek J, et al. Evidence for the relationship of calcium
to blood pressure. Nutrition Reviews 1996;54(12):365-381. |
| 4. |
Centonze S, Boeing
H, Leoci C, et al. Dietary habits and colorectal cancer in a
low-risk area. Results from a population-based case-control
study in southern Italy. Nutr Cancer 1994;21(3):233-46. |
| 5. |
Shannon J, White
E, Shattuck AL, Potter JD. Relationship of food groups and water
intake to colon cancer risk. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev
1996;5(7):495-502. |
| 6. |
Kato I, Akhmedkhanov
A, Koenig K, et al. Prospective study of diet and female colorectal
cancer: the New York University Women's Health Study. Nutr and
Cancer 1997;28(3):276-81. |
| 7. |
Holt PR, Atillasoy
EO, Gilman J, et al. Modulation of abnormal colonic epithelial
cell proliferation and differentiation by low-fat diary foods.
J Amer Med Assoc 1998;280:1074-79. |
| 8. |
Knekt P, Jarvinen
R, Seppanin R, et al. Intake of dairy products and the risk
of breast cancer. Br J Cancer 1996;73(5):687-91. |
| 9. |
J¨arvinen R, Knekt
P, Sepp¨anen R, Teppo L. Diet and breast cancer risk in a cohort
of Finnish women. Cancer Letters 1997;114(1-2):251-3. |
| 10. |
Witte JS, Ursin G,
Siemiatycki J, et al. Diet and premenopausal bilateral breast
cancer: a case-control study. Breast Canc Res Treatment 1997;42(3):243-51. |
| 11. |
Hirose K, Tajima
K, Hamajima N, et al. Subsite (cervix/endometrium)-specific
risk and protective factors in uterus cancer. Japanese J Canc
Res 1996;87(9):1001-1009. |
| 12. |
Tzonou A, Lipworth
L, Kalandidi A, et al. Dietary factors and the risk of endometrial
cancer: A case-control study in Greece. Br J Cancer 1996;73(10):1284-1290. |
| 13. |
Parodi PW. A role
for milk proteins in cancer prevention. Australian J Dairy Technology
1998;53:37-42. |
| 14. |
Parodi PW. Cows'
milk fat components as potential anticarcinogenic agents. J
Nutr 1997;127:1055-60. |
| 15. |
Curhan GC, Willett
WC, Rimm EB, Stampfer MJ. Family history and risk of kidney
stones. J Am Soc Nephrol 1997;8:1568-73. |
| 16. |
Curhan GC. Dietary
calcium, dietary protein and kidney stone formation. Miner Electrolyte
Metab 1997;23:261-4. |
| 17. |
Scrimshaw NS, Murray
EB. The acceptability of milk and milk products in populations
with a high prevalence of lactose intolerance. Amer J Clin Nutr
1988;48(4 Supplement):1079-159.
|
|
|

 |
|

 |
|
|
|
Table
1:
Calcium Content Comparison of California vs. Federal Fluid Milk Standards*
|
CA
Standard*
(8.7-11% NFDM)
|
Federal
Standard*
(8.25% NFDM)
|
|
Whole Milk
|
276 |
261 |
|
2% Reduced Fat
|
317 |
261 |
|
1% Low Fat
|
348 |
261 |
|
Non Fat
|
285 |
261 |
All values are in milligrams
of calcium, for 8 oz. (244 g) of milk.
Values are based on nutrient content of NFDM and extrapolated to
appropriate level of fortification. NFDM values from Handbook 8-1,
1976. Minimum nonfat solids content standards for California are
as follows: whole milk=8.7%, 2% milk=10%, 1% milk=11%, nonfat milk=9%.
NFDM = non-fat dry milk solids.
*These are the minimum
California and federal standards.
Table 2:
Protein Content of Milk under California vs. Fluid Milk Standards*
|
CA
Standard
(8.7-11% NFDM)
|
Federal
Standard*
(8.25% NFDM)
|
|
Whole Milk
|
7.9 |
7.5 |
|
2% Reduced Fat
|
9.1 |
7.5 |
|
1% Low Fat
|
10.0 |
7.5 |
|
Non Fat
|
8.2 |
7.5 |
All values are in grams
of protein, for 8 oz. milk.
Values are based on nutrient content of NFDM and extrapolated to
appropriate level of fortification. NFDM values from Handbook 8-1,
1976. Minimum nonfat solids content standards for California are
as follows: whole milk=8.7%, 2% milk=10%, 1% milk=11%, nonfat milk=9%.
NFDM = non-fat dry milk solids.
*These are the minimum
California and federal minimum standards.
|
|
 |
|
|